after three separate times I've finally managed to get dracut to resume for me
turns out, the module is only enabled if there's a swap /partition/ which is a PROBLEM if you're resuming from a fucking swap /file/.
Not sure what to make of the dev responses though?
Replying to @nabijaczleweli
This patch (or removing the check entirely) – https://github.com/nabijaczleweli/dracut/blob/8c1064e1b5dc20004e065e69b578c7d6836e02a7/debian/patches/resume-file – fixes the issue by also including the module when swap files are active.
Granted, seeing as this check is only performed in host-only mode, I can't see why one wouldn't check if /sys/power/resume != 0:0, but
Replying to @nabijaczleweli
update: they just got back from putting her down
beats a slow renal-failure-induced death ig but still :(
Replying to @nabijaczleweli
well, that's uhhh not gonna work all that well, now is it?
baby (2x)
baby (2x)-ng
Replying to @nabijaczleweli
replacement wlan antenna covers since the manual said they are not to be shipped unprotected apparently?
I made a Debian package from scratch today, went exactly how you'd think – impenetrable from the outside since nothing actually explains what the build process is supposed to be, but now that i get the gist, I'm forgetting what the roadblocks actually were, so I can't fix that :/
Replying to @nabijaczleweli
anyway, paclage https://foreign.nabijaczleweli.xyz/debian/README :)
Replying to @mcclure111
volatile binds like const, so it'd be `(volatile uint32_t) *` and `(uint32_t *) volatile`
Replying to @mcclure111 and @rsroobre
the useful one
Replying to @rsroobre and @mcclure111
PoC (implemented the other way around because only stripping cv-qualifiers is an error): http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/64221e475fe7926e
RT @thecoshman: I still find it so odd that I accidentally designed a good tool and been lucky enough that @nabijaczleweli implemented it.…
Replying to @nabijaczleweli
pir-8-emu (and BearLibTerminal, which was a bigger adventure) now available as a Debian package: https://foreign.nabijaczleweli.xyz/debian/README
im honestly blown away by how good of a tool gbp-pq is, and not just usable, it's actually *helpful*??
granted, the documentation is dogshit (expectedly, but how much it misses the point is quite something) so it dissuaded me from trying to use it for a big long time, but still
reasonable idea? horrible hack?
Replying to @nabijaczleweli
well.. hm
Replying to @nabijaczleweli
good news: it's reproducible
bad news: i3-wm on sid is 4.17.1, which is too old to report a bug against upstream
Replying to @nabijaczleweli
ive sent the maintainer a nice email on the bugtracker lets ho[e he doesn't yell at me >_<
Replying to @nabijaczleweli
new ISA, featuring more bad decisions, but at least you can actually implement strcpy() to port (left; WIP, missing ADDC to do more than 255) without having to self-modify the code area with the LOAD IND argument (right; current) so that's an... improvement? i guess??
Replying to @nabijaczleweli
idk the more i think about this the stupider it sounds but like.. i feel like a little bit of the "soul" or whatever of the architecture was lost today.. now it reads closer to a 6502 with its 80%-LDA/STAe code than a.. Different Thing™?
Replying to @nabijaczleweli
it's ALIVE
Replying to @nabijaczleweli
that's 655 bytes, with minimal modifications to the assembly! couldn't do *this* before! (well you could I guess but it was too much of a garbage-fire even for me)